From b5f4b7730beeb02e58a563986693cf2aa87e2ea3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tiago Cunha <tcunha@gmx.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:53:33 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Update.

---
 FAQ | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/FAQ b/FAQ
index 8bdc0ed3..ae5470a2 100644
--- a/FAQ
+++ b/FAQ
@@ -14,13 +14,14 @@ tmux offers several advantages over screen:
 - multiple paste buffers;
 - choice of vim or emacs key layouts;
 - an option to limit the window size;
+- a more usable status line syntax, with the ability to display the first line
+  of output of a specific command;
 - a cleaner, modern, easily extended, BSD-licensed codebase.
 
 There are still a few features screen includes that tmux omits:
 
 - builtin serial and telnet support; this is bloat and is unlikely to be added
   to tmux;
-- a more customisable status line, albeit with an awful syntax;
 - wider platform support, for example IRIX and AIX, and for odd terminals.
 - better UTF-8 support.